We Wanted a Square Sink, Not an Oval One!
A homeowner
recently remodeled his master bath area.
He and his wife spent several weeks working with a contractor to
identify all of the work that was desired to update the bathroom. Construction day finally arrived, and after
two weeks of living in the basement guest suite, the homeowner was excited to
finally get back into his master suite.
The granite counter top was
installed, one of the final steps in the construction process. Immediately, the homeowner noticed an
error! The granite countertop, all one
piece, had an oval cut out for the sink,
not a square cut off that was originally designed. Oops—a big mistake.
The granite installer went ahead and
installed the countertop, thinking that the homeowner, after living 2 weeks in
the basement would accept an oval sink instead of the square sink. Well, no dice! The homeowner was unwilling to accept the
error and required that a new piece of granite be installed, properly designed
and cut to his original specifications.
Well, 2 more weeks of basement
living, 4 trips of 140 miles each way for the granite company, another piece of
$3000 granite--- again, errors of monumental proportions that should not have
happened if the attention to detail step was performed all along the way.
The contractor offered to “reduce
the price” for the countertop—however, the homeowner did not want an oval
sink—he and his wife ordered a square sink.
How could this error happen? Again, failing to pay attention to detail,
carefully reading the customer requirements caused the granite company to have
to “absorb” the rework costs of the countertop.
Can the granite cut in error be salvaged? Perhaps, if some smaller pieces can be cut
from the larger piece.
Was the homeowner unreasonable with
the contractor? No, in our opinion. The homeowner ordered what he wanted and was
delivered something that failed to match his requirements.
We have said this previously, but
will say it again—close attention to detail is necessary and required in all
facets of business operations.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home